keeping the Barthian in me honest

CalvinusThe time has come for me to launch into my final year project in earnest. I’m investigating the connection between the way Calvin welds the Old and New Testaments together and his Christology — an investigation I hope will shed some light on how this towering Reformer wove together what we might call biblical theology with systematic theology.

This warning sounded by Richard Muller (The Unaccommodated Calvin, p 14) will provide a touchstone for my investigation:

The sixteenth-century Calvin, the Calvin who was born a Catholic, whose theology was learned primarily in and through his work as a commentator and Reformer, whose work evidences the impact of humanist philology and rhetoric, of patristic study, but also, both positively and negatively, of the categories of medieval scholastic thought, and whose conclusions, together with those of a group of contemporary Reformed and Lutheran thinkers, became a basis for much of later Protestant theology — this Calvin cannot easily be accommodated to the needs and desires of modern Barthians or Schleiermacherians. Nor does this Calvin admit of intellectual or psychological bifurcation along the lines of twentieth-century prejudice. A reading of Calvin’s thought in its sixteenth-century context, in other words, yields the picture of a theology at once intriguing and intractible to twentieth-century concerns.

That’ll keep the Barthian in me honest!

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s