CPE reflections (1)

1. The nature of loss

Kenneth R. Mitchell and Hebert Anderson (All Our Losses, All Our Griefs) point out that although it tends to receive the most focussed attention, death is not the only time people experience loss: ‘Loss, other than the most brutal separation from those we love, is not worth worrying about, society seems to say’. But those losses to which we pay less attention often reverberate longer and more profoundly in our lives.

Thus Mitchell and Anderson outline six major types of loss:

  1. Material loss
  2. Relationship loss
  3. Intrapsychic loss
  4. Functional loss
  5. Role loss
  6. Systemic lossIn their discussing of material loss

I particularly appreciated the distinction between ‘intrinsic’ and ‘extrinsic’ value they introduced. Some people scoff at taking the loss of physical objects (or environments) too seriously, as though it’s too materialistic or romantic (which it could be — the idolatrous temptation to value created things more than the Creator should not to be underestimated). However, when the extrinsic value of material things is taken into account, it’s easier to understand the grief experienced when they’re lost. Thesignificance of a gift from a loved one, for example, is what makes its loss so painful.

This also goes some way towards explaining the urge to replace a lost object — even if only with a copy. It’s not the object itself that but what it means that matters.

Mitchell and Anderson also acknowledge the complexity of many experiences of loss — one type of loss often gives rise to others.

Hence the importance of reckoning with intrapsychic loss, which often accompanies other kinds of loss — especially material, relationship and functional loss. Such losses can deprive us of the possibility of realising our hopes and dreams about ‘what might have been’. This is intrapsychic loss. Because these hopes and dreams are usually private, quite a lot of gentle prodding (within a context of trust and relational safety) may be required to help someone articulate the complexity of this — ie. grieving can involve confronting the absence not just of what was and what it meant but also of what it seemed to promise.

Likewise, functional loss — particularly common in therapeutic settings — often contributes to role and systemic loss. Not only does the loss of, e.g., muscular or neurological function threaten the patient’s sense of autonomy (giving rise to the impulse to deny its reality or impact), but it can also entail the surrendering of meaningful roles — at work or in the home. More, it can require the relinquishment of an established place in systems like the family, thus affecting many people. It’s not just the relationship with the patient that changes, but the whole system: the family’s life can feel like it will never be the same.

Mitchell and Anderson’s closing comments about some major variables that ‘add to the unpredictability of grief and underscore just how many ways loss is experienced’ drive home the (often unacknowledged) pervasiveness of loss. While it may take different forms and display different intensities — depending on whether it’s avoidable or unavoidable, temporary or permanent, anticipated or unanticipated, etc — loss is something we’ll often need to deal with, not just when someone dies catastrophically.

One comment

  1. In mid 2007 I suffered a bout of Viral Encephalitis. It gave me a high temp of 41 plus… paralysed me on the right side, hospitalising me for 2 months… over the next 12 months I went through a horrible experience of domestic violence from my wife, seperated, lived in the back of my van for 6 weeks, was black banned from my previous church etc….

    I went through all 6 of those points. Now I have remarried to a wonderful
    godly woman. I am back at college, though part time and do voluntary chaplaincy work with homeless men.

    When one goes through a traumatic experience like that you have no choice but to exist within a vacuum of normality filled with grief, fear and pain…which is so intense it covers over you, flows through you and fills you from your very core…

    I believe that its only when you come face to face with nothing and the true substance of your identity and substance is stripped away…. then one can truly develop their identity in Christ and truly say this without just making a mental and verbal assent to this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s